Woody Allen Controversy - Who Is To Be Believed?

What we DO know is that a) Mia reacted much more passionately to the Soon-Yi thing at the time (producer had to persuade her to come back to shoot the last couple of scenes for Husbands and Wives) than any allegation supposedly put forward by Dylan (after the charge of molestation, she still called Woody about costume fittings for Manhattan Murder Mystery due to shoot in 5 weeks). b) Alleged venue of abuse was the attic Woody wouldn't go into c) Team Mia - Dylan and Ronan - were 7 and an infant respectively, whereas Team Woody Soon-Yi and Moses make more credible witnesses of the context of the household circa 1992. d) Woody would have been happy with Soon-Yi and on enemy turf on the date in question where such a monstrous risk and violation is unlikely. e) Woody has had 22 years of his name being sullied for the accusations alone. f) Two states have vetted him and Soon-Yi for current adoptions g) Why did Mia sign-off on her footage for the tribute that so offended her unless she wanted it as an excuse to fan the flames? h) Woody has directed 22 films since 1992 and acted in others and received honours for which Mia was silent (apart from writing What Falls Away) while her career sputtered.  i) If she was such a great mother, why treat Soon-Yi as the "other woman" and shut her out?  And if Woody were a pedo, how would it escape the notice of Soon-Yi ?  Therefore I believe the brainwashing angle.